Borzage’s The River and Strange Cargo

André Bazin once wrote, “Our melodrama in the last century has lost almost all its dramatic integrity and merely survives as a parody.” If that was true in the 1950s (with Sirk and Ray at the height of their powers), it’s definitely true today, when ironic detachment reigns supreme. Outside of contemporary Korean cinema, the best examples of melodrama still hail from classic Hollywood, and few of them shine more brightly than the work of Frank Borzage, whose scant representation on DVD leaves a gaping hole in the medium: Borzage’s best films are full-blooded, convinced and convincing tributes to passionate devotion and transformative love.

Fittingly, a foreign distributor–the exemplary Edition Filmmuseum–is the first to release a Borzage touchstone on DVD: his once-lost masterpiece The River (1929), one of several artistically ambitious films that suffered with Hollywood’s transition to sound (see also Borzage’s Lucky Star and F.W. Murnau’s 4 Devils and City Girl). The 2-disc set contains a dense 35-minute film essay by UCLA’s Janet Bergstrom describing the era, Murnau and Borzage at Fox: The Expressionist Heritage, along with some Borzage shorts, and essays by The River‘s reconstructionist, Hervé Dumont. (Warner has also just released another notable Borzage title, 1940′s Strange Cargo, packaged in a boxed tribute to its star, Joan Crawford; more on this in a bit.)

The River is still missing its beginning and ending, and two scenes in between, leaving a running time of 43 of its original 84 minutes, but with archival stills and explanatory intertitles, the entire reconstruction runs 55 minutes. Its setting is a dam construction site “somewhere in the Rocky Mountains” that is temporarily suspended. A young man named Allen John (Charles Farrell) wants to sail his barge down the river to the sea, but the dam has left treacherous, impassable rapids. One day while swimming nude, he narrowly avoids a deadly whirlpool and jumps out of the river, only to come face to face with Rosalee (Mary Duncan), the world weary girlfriend of a construction foreman convicted of murdering a rival. Allen John and Rosalee (whose only companion is a crow–more curse than comfort–given to her by her incarcerated lover) are both stranded, physically and emotionally, and begin a highly charged flirtation that pivots around his naiveté and her teasing sophistication. Eventually, as their relationship intensifies, all parties involved must dramatically come to terms.

Though it would doubtless be ideal to have the entire film as a piece, the negation of its first and last acts–by far its most melodramatic and plot-heavy–only emphasizes the middle act’s exquisitely subtle, interpersonal maneuverings, its dance of attractions and sexual tensions between the protagonists in and around Rosalee’s cabin in the woods. Thus it’s ironic that in Frank Borzage: The Life and Films of a Hollywood Romantic Hervé Dumont writes, “Practically all the American press criticized Borzage for overdeveloping the intimate scenes to the detriment of the action…in reality, the strong sensuality of the love scenes shocked puritanical America, so much that The River was banned in several states and by tacit consensus its diffusion was limited.”

The more intimate sections provide a vivid testament to Borzage’s emotional brilliance–especially in his use of space and actor positions that express the characters’ mixture of awkward but desirous feelings as they slowly, over the course of the film, physically unite. In their first encounter, Allen John hides his nakedness by jumping back into the river; later (after missing the train), Rosalee invites him to dinner and they stand nervously on her doorstep; Allen John constantly attempts to provide for her needs by chopping wood or bringing provisions, which she receives with indifference in the hopes of achieving deeper intimacy. Allen John is clearly attracted to Rosalee but appears to have no idea how to act upon it. (When she curiously asks him how many women he has known, he misunderstands and tells her none, given the fact that his mother died when he was a boy.) Rosalee’s frustration builds to the moment when she lies in bed and Allen John tries to set up a checkers game between the; she furiously throws the pieces aside and breathes, “I’m thinking of you” while passionately stroking her breast. Allen John’s inability to respond enflames Rosalle’s aggression, but their relationship ultimately culminates in a tender, life giving embrace. As the critic-filmmaker Jean Mitry once put it: “The game of these two people who desire, seek out and refuse each other instead of acting like everyone else in the most banal melodramas…. Rarely has the psychology of love–sensual, erotic–been rendered so exactly in its troubling, simple, complexity.”

Borzage and Murnau had more in common than industry woes; they also shared actors and personnel at Fox, including cinematographer Ernest Palmer, who at one point was filming The River during the day and Murnau’s 4 Devils at night. Bergstrom contends that the studio head, William Fox, thought Murnau’s The Last Laugh was the greatest film ever made and that Murnau was an artistic genius. The near carte-blanche Fox gave the production of Sunrise included a vision that spread throughout the studio. In her documentary, Bergstrom inserts an aerial photo of the studio backlot with its Rocky Mountain set from The River just around the bend from the city set in Sunrise–both incorporating forced perspective scaling and painted backdrops–a miniature Disneyland of innovative cinema.

Borzage’s elaborate set is a major component of his emotional use of space. The construction camp is a quasi-expressionist string of huts emphasizing the community of workers and contrasting John Allen and Rosalee’s initial isolation. (By way of character introduction, John Allen is standing in his stranded barge calling to the workers onshore, and Rosalee is loitering on the riverbank in frustrated contemplation as the workers stream past.) The huts connect with a rope bridge that spans the river and connects to a series of stairs that connects with the train platform, with more stairs that descend to Rosalee’s cabin. Borzage emphasizes this elaborate network of paths each time characters cross the river, maintaining continuity and tracking their ascents and descents as if they’re trapped in a necessary maze. At heart, the story is about lonely characters who seek release together, and the setting works like an extended metaphor–the river as obstructed destiny, the sea as ultimate freedom, and the deadly whirlpool as the ultimate trap that literally pulls victims into itself, sucking them into the earth, preventing escape and ensuring death.

A title card in Borzage’s Street Angel proclaims its story is about “human souls made great by love and adversity,” a phrase that has been used for at least one book-length study of the filmmaker, and it’s an apt description of so many of his pinnacle achievements that I’ve had the pleasure of watching the past few years: Seventh Heaven, Lucky Star, History is Made at Night (which Andrew Sarris appropriately called “the most romantic title in the history of cinema”), Three Comrades, The Mortal Storm, and Moonrise–none of which have been released on DVD in the US yet. To this list I’d also add the recently released Strange Cargo (starring Joan Crawford and Clark Gable), an oddly intense spiritual parable about a group of prisoners who attempt to escape Devil’s Island through the jungle and surrounding ocean; the escapees include a bitter call girl (Crawford), an unrepentant thief (Gable), and various other hardened criminals; all of whom must bond with each other in friendship or in love in order to transcend the perils of nature, and Borzage underlines the spiritual and emotional projects of each character in ways that parallel their physical journeys. The film maintains a visual emphasis on actors’ faces as if peering into their souls. While it’s sometimes criticized for its heavy-handed religious metaphors (one mysterious character is overtly Christlike), it’s a movie that consistently shuns dogmatism (a fundamentalist is just as spiritually lost as anyone else) and wholly embraces personal intuition and compassion. Highly recommended for those who enjoy their melodramas served with trenchant conviction.

Guadalajara film fest, Entry 5


Jose Avellar

MOMENTS OF GUADALAJARA

By Robert Koehler

Good stuff….Brian De Palma was here with Redacted, but unlike almost any director who ever attends a festival with his/her own film–exceptions include Lisandro Alonso, Pedro Costa, Jose Luis Guerin, the other “Joe,” Lav Diaz, Raya Martin, Albert Serra, Monte Hellman and the late Curtis Harrington–he actually went to see movies….This whole film-viewing thing proved too much for De Palma at one point, when he had to leave a botched screening of the even more botched Cuban film Personal Belongings, since the Cuban print source forgot to send the festival an English-subtitled print (blame Cuba), and look for his driver. Walking out, he looked at me with his arm outstretched in total frustration and confusion: “What are we supposed to do now?” (Indeed–at least two juries, with non-Spanish-speaking members, were stuck in the screening.) “You escaped,” I told him. He smiled, then wandered around the large Cinepolis multiplex looking for his driver, who had become lost. De Palma found him….

More great Argentine films than the mind could handle, with Tan de repente and Born and Bred and La cienega and Extrano and, our favorite, La libertad (and where oh where was Parapalos or Silvia Prieto?), all as they say back on the big screen where they belong. Even if the first reel of La libertad (so is this the print that Alonso keeps under his bed?) was out of sync….Lots of guys on screen, like Alonso’s Misael, could be seen catching animals and cooking and eating them over open flames in the woods. This happened in more than one film (three, at least), and maybe it suggested the future of eating out…..Lots of films featuring refugees leaving their homeland and grinding poverty for opportunity, from Teo’s Journey to 14 kms….

The lounge area of the Hotel Fiestamericana, the official festival hub, turned into a moveable feast and watering hole for festival guests, including AFI Fest director Rose Kuo and AFI programmer Shaz Bennett; Cinevegas’ inimitable (and Sundance’s go-to-guy for their best section, New Frontier) Mike Plante (get this dude going on James Benning, and forget whatever plans you might have for the evening); Fernando Eimbcke roaming about and looking understandably happy; Eimbcke’s equally pleased sales agent, Peter Danner of Paris-based sales company Funny Balloons, which has quickly become an ace at handling many of the best Latin American films; PoChu AuYeung, program director of just about my favorite festival, Vancouver; Joseph Beyer, of Sundance Institute Online; the ever-friendly Raymond Phathanavirangoon of Fortissimo, who chatted about Fortissimo’s fabulous pressbooks (if you get your hands on their book for Syndromes and a Century, never let it go!); Variety‘s Madrid (and now Paris) correspondent, John Hopewell; Variety‘s once and (maybe?) future Mexico City correspondent Michael O’Boyle and his Hollywood Reporter counterpart John Hecht, mensches both; IMCINE’s new director Marina Stavenhagen; Huelva festival director Eduardo Trias; indefatigable producer Donald Ranvaud, whose Buena Onda Pictures is now re-settling in Los Angeles from Miami, where “things just didn’t work well”; Juan Carlos Rulfo, he of the masterful doc Into the Pit, embarking on an ambitious project as a producer of films by new Mexican filmmakers; a glimpse of Argentina’s grand old cineaste, Fernando “Pino” Solanas; Los Angeles Latino International Film Festival director Marlene Dermer (Los Angeles being all over Guadalajara); former Variety critic and current director of the Cineteca in Mexico City, Leonardo Garcia Tsao; and elsewhere–most memorably in the Guadalajara market area of the hotel, on Skype video with his wife in Rio–Jose Avellar, dean of Brazilian film critics and creator of his own wonderfully visual website, escrevercinema.com, that’s a close cousin in some respects to David Bordwell’s fine site; and Mad Filmes’ sales person from Lisbon, Susana Rodrigues, who knows her cinema….

And nobody knows their cinema quite like Jean-Pierre Garcia, director of the Amiens film festival, who eat, drinks and sleeps cinema–particularly American and Latin American cinema, especially by filmmakers maudit (Cy Endfield is one of his latest projects)….When I happened to mention my love of Nikkatsu Studios, Garcia happened to have a copy of a book published by the Amiens festival (why don’t American festivals do the same?) on Nikkatsu and its bevy of maverick directors. This is part of Amiens’ longterm project to survey great non-Hollywood studios around the world, from Studio Babelsberg to Cinecitta….

Plus some thanks are more than due to festival programmer Lucy Virgen, who has as much as any one person provided Guadalajara with an injection of imagination and breadth, and to press director Paco Fernandez, who’s a model of his kind….

A festival is about the films, first, and the people in the dark rooms, second, but I had some wonderful neighbors for the eight days of screenings, including Roger Alan Koza, the extremely enthusiastic programmer/critic/cinephile straight from La Cumbre, Argentina; Israeli critics Dan and Edna Fainaru (best known to English readers as Screen Daily‘s critics, and who also run Israel’s only long-running film journal, Cinematheque), who also happen to be a terrific married couple; Mr. FIPRESCI himself Klaus Eder, desiring to get more American and Canadian film critics to festivals (always a good thought); Salon‘s film critic Stephanie Zacharek, who was the only other American critic besides myself in Guadalajara; and last but certainly not least Cristina Venegas, the mind behind Santa Barbara festival’s terrific Cinemedia section of Ibero-American film, which contained about as many fine new films from Mexico as could be found in Guadalajara this year, which won’t exactly be remembered (well, at least so far) as a banner year for Mexican film…..

Not-so-good stuff…..Almost nobody with the festival ever introducing a screening (what’s up with that?)….Many significant films poorly attended, with some of those who did deploying their cell phones at all times during screenings….Talking, talking, and more talking….and more talking….Lots of flubs in the Cinepolis projection booths, including frame alignment, screen masking, sound control (as in no sound at times), improper aspect ratio, and my personal favorite, just letting the final reel run through the projector until there’s nothing but the glaring projector light on screen….Those pesky projected English subtitles under the screen were almost always on cue, but damn, were they ever hard to read (making the experience of watching and reading the chatterbox The Elite Squad rather a strain)….great volunteers, but guys, let those of us waiting for the next screening know when it’s starting, OK?…..

Above all, the Guadalajara festival should have ABSOLUTELY NOTHING to do with the Hollywood Foreign Press Association, that gifted group that imposes the Golden Globes on us every year (except this one, when they were blissfully reduced to a suitably numb press conference….Someone at the festival (who?) thinks it’s a wonderful notion that the competition juries should suggest Mexican films to be considered for the foreign Globes nominations (this year, it was Lake Tahoe and The Desert Within)….Someone (the same person(s)?) thinks it’s also a nifty idea to have a member of the HFPA on one of the juries….Any American reader with any awareness of the movies knows how fairly ludicrous this is, but the shame is that the joke that is the HFPA hasn’t caught on in Mexico…..Well, let it start now: HFPA is a joke, and Guadalajara, if it’s to become a festival ready to go to the next level, should stay clear of it….

Guadalajara film fest, Entry 4

GUADALAJARA’S MEXICAN PROBLEM

By Robert Koehler

Sure enough, as Guadalajara wound down, Lake Tahoe was one Mexican film in the competition that mattered, and as the paltry and fairly pathetic lineup played out, proved its value as a way out of the dead-end of what often passes for “comedy” in Mexican film….even if, as I noted before, Eimbcke’s film isn’t properly a comedy. (His ability to shift from comedy to tragedy only demonstrates Eimbcke’s confidence in his own comic abilities; oddly for a young man, like late Chaplin, he has the toolkit firmly in hand so that when drama and even tragedy is required, humor isn’t forgotten.) But Lake Tahoe wasn’t all by its lonesome. Rodrigo Pla’s The Desert Within (which I’ve reviewed for Variety) proved to be another Mexican film that will travel, and actually was preferred in some circles to Eimbcke’s. (A few festival goers even claimed that it was the best film they had seen so far this year, period.)

So, Mexican cinema wasn’t a total loss at Guadalajara, but it wasn’t a pretty picture either. This happens every year here, and it stuns visitors coming for the first time. Nobody warns them (OK, I will) that the Mexican sections here literally comprise what’s available; that’s to say that any new feature narrative or documentary that’s done and uncommitted to premiering future festivals (think Cannes) is placed in the lineup, with the exception of the most nakedly commercial product, which is consigned to the hell that is “out of competition.” (I’ve never met a soul who’s gone to those screenings.) These aren’t curated like the festival’s Ibero-American sections, and it behooves the visitor to know this ahead of time. I’m still recovering from the shock in 2006 (when I was a GDL virgin) of plunking myself down in a seat on the festival’s second day to see something called Los pajarracos, only to witness reels of garbage masquerading as a spoof of border culture and politics. Right then and there, I was disabused of the notion that what was premiered in Guadalajara was the best new Mexican cinema. It was ALL the new Mexican cinema, available in the spring each year, that could be run through a projector or played on a deck.

But here’s a contradiction to chew on: It’s actually not all of the new films. Guadalajara has done its part in putting Mexican film on the international map, but much like Fajr festival did for Iranian film (pre-Cannes), it has lost premieres to other places. Some docmakers now consider waiting to first show their work in Morelia, which has quickly caught on as one of the best doc festivals in captivity. Others have become attracted to FICCO (Mexico City, running just prior to Guadalajara), with its “Mexico Digital” section of new video-shot work. Others–like Amat Escalante, with his latest and highly anticipated Los bastardos–are waiting word from Cannes, and the siren call of “Palme d’Or/Certain Regard/Quinzaine/Semaine.” (Mexico was all over Cannes last year, and there’s every expectation that it will be again.) A victim of Mexican success, Guadalajara is being passed over by some–not by Pla, significantly, even though he’s just off of a completely undeserving Venice prize for his lousy debut, La zona and, thus, presumably on the European festival fame train. The resulting basket of movies the festival has to work with doesn’t mean a daily dosage of crap–well, some are, and just too sad and bad to even mention here–but it does mean that the result is an oddly skewed perspective on the Mexican film scene. This is especially the case since it’s a program that continues to be dominated by films funded largely or in part by IMCINE, the government film funding body that casts a giant shadow over the country’s cinema, even as it’s never touched the likes of Reygadas, Escalante, Eugenio Polgovsky and several other independent filmmakers who’ve carved out alternative means of funding and promotion.

It’s this independent sphere where Mexico’s film-video future lies, not in the institutional brand of movie that sticks to conventional treatments and modes. (To get an idea, look no further here than so-called “popular” comedies like Know the Head of Juan Perez, also in competition right alongside a Lake Tahoe.) The institution-to-independence pattern has been breaking out across Mexico for the past decade-plus, ever since Mexico wisely ended its closed economy, signed up to NAFTA (a profound boon to the country’s economy and vibrancy, regardless of whatever nonsense you may have heard lately) and freed itself from the political monopoly of the PRI party which governed Mexico for generations. Like the old politics, the old kind of movie–still loved by a good deal of filmgoers and movie renters here–is cracking up. If the visitor squints really hard, that nice bit of news is visible in Guadalajara. It would be even nicer if no squinting were required.

Guadalajara film fest, blog 3

FROM BERLIN TO GUADALAJARA, CONT.

By Robert Koehler

By my count, although there are several films here direct from Berlin, only one is from Berlin’s most interesting section, the Forum: Ishtar Yasin’s astonishing debut, El Camino. This is the kind of film Forum was built for, and that Guadalajara would do well to show more of–intensely committed personal cinema that brooks no compromise, and expects an audience that demands no less. Yet El Camino is made of, and about, simple things. The opening sections seem to blow right out of the head of Lino Brocka, with warm images of Nicaraguan kids in an outdoor classroom asked to describe the making of Lake Managua contrasted with hellish, smoke-drenched images of a massive and thoroughly disturbing landfill, where young Saslaya (Sherlyn Paola Velasquez) and little brother Dario (Marcos Ulises Jimenez) live with their grandfather (Cornelio Flores Meza) in a shack at the landfill’s edge. Dario, like the girl in La rabia, is mute, but has his big sister’s hand to hold onto; Saslaya is viewed by Yasin as a watcher, trying to get a fresh view of her hell by looking at it through a shard of found glass, the first of several moments in the film where art is made out of bits and pieces, and in the moment.

Saslaya and Dario hit the road–el camino–after grandfather is seen by dim Vittorio Storaro candlelight trying to molest Saslaya in their hammock. The desire is to find their mother, working somewhere in Costa Rica, but the impulse is also to flee extreme physical and psychic danger. The road, and all of its dangers, is better than this, the film says wordlessly. (Yasin was born in Moscow of an Iraqi father and a Chilean-Costa Rican mother, and studied at Moscow’s State Film Institute as part of the first post-Communist era batch of graduates, and she shows a deep regard and respect for Russian silent cinema and its love of the natural world.) Their adventure has been described as “picaresque,” but this isn’t actually the tone that Yasin takes. Instead, she’s most interested in conveying the pure experience of willing oneself to leave home, walk (and boat) to a point unknown and know that somehow it’s possible to get there. If there’s belief behind this, it’s the belief in being able to make the journey, a belief harbored internally and never expressed verbally, only sensed. Many scenes play out like documentary, or if they’re pre-arranged, then all of the feeling of arrangement has been drained out of them, very much like Alonso. Only an episode with a urchin who badly needs playmates seems to literally salute neo-realism; otherwise, the film is directly, harshly, real.

Just days ago, British-born and Mexico-based documentary filmmaker John Dickie (El diablo y nota rota) was describing to me the terrifying and inhuman conditions of life in today’s Central America, how “it gets worse the further south you go.” Watching El Camino little more than 48 hours after our conversation rendered his disturbing word pictures rather mild, as the film emits the stench and torpor of existence there, so lived-in is every scene and sequence. Despite all of this, and quite counter-intuitively, Surrealist comedy floats through like thought bubbles: A pair of Roman Polanski-esque guys carry a table from Nicaragua to Costa Rica, trailing Saslaya and Dario beat by beat. After Brocka, Alonso and Pudovkin–and maybe, who knows, a touch of Apichatpong, when things move into the deep jungle during the final border crossing–who could’ve guessed that the film ends in a shadowy Costa Rican brothel setting that out-disturbs David Lynch? The ending is much like the way dreams end–abruptly, on a note of possibly impending doom (or at least change), on a detail that can barely be perceived (ceiling cornice, I believe), with thoughts drifting possibly toward oblivion, or to the light.

Guadalajara film fest, blog 2

FROM BERLIN TO GUADALAJARA

By Robert Koehler

The Guadalajara festival’s position on the calendar–besides being at a blissfully moderate time of year for the weather–allows it to pluck Latin American films from the various sections of Berlin. Last year, that meant for instance that Chico Teixera’s brilliant feature debut, Alice’s House (which recently played at the Nuart and with the most exquisite lead female performance, by Carla Ribas, in any film I’ve seen in the past two years at least) could go straight from Berlin’s Panorama to Guadalajara’s Iberoamerican feature competition. Lucia Murat’s newest, Mare, Our Love Story (or curiously titled in some quarters as Another Love Story), has taken an identical route this year. Eimbcke’s Lake Tahoe, which I commented on in my previous post, hit Guadalajara immediately from Berlin’s main competition, as did Jose Padilha’s deeply flawed The Elite Squad, which my Variety colleague Jay Weissberg termed in his review as “a recruitment film for fascist thugs,” with Albertina Carri’s sinewy and brave La rabia, coming from Panorama and Ishtar Yasin’s amazing post-neo-realist debut out of Costa Rica direct from the Forum. The effect of this Berliner wave washing up in Guadalajara is to underscore how effectively Latin America has been able to declare itself in major festivals–even ones, like this Berlin edition, which was by consensus a bust–and how Latin American filmmakers can be viewed as either keeping a healthy distance from Hollywood (Carri, Eimbcke, Yasin, even Murat, though her film contains some sweet nods to West Side Story) or not (Padilha).

This is why the churning, steaming sturm und drang generated by The Elite Squad in Berlin is much ado about very little. The film is minor through and through, but its Golden Bear win makes it a topic of conversation and essential viewing of a sort. Padilha’s work here was little more than pulling and patching together remembered and revised scraps and bits from an endless list of American cop dramas and T.V. shows, from Dirty Harry to The Shield to S.W.A.T., with all of the standard tropes of the genre. A burnt-out case (Wagner Moura) is, as usual for this type of character, on the edge of sanity as he leads his unit of elite cops into Rio’s drug-infested favela slums. The guy talks up a storm, at least on the soundtrack: In a nearly two-hour film, Moura must have at least 45 minutes’ worth of cynical, irony-drenched voice-over narration (I estimate, though it seemed like five hours’ worth to my ears), reportedly attached by Padilha to the soundtrack during the editing—a sure sign of creative panic. As usual, there are the younger pups of the squad, one trigger-happy (Caio Junqueira) and one studious and civilized (Andre Ramiro), including the de rigeur PC reversal of buried racial expectations–another standard T.V. cop touch. And like a paltry HBO show–no, The Elite Squad isn’t really good enough for HBO, and will never remind anyone of The Wire, so think the Starz Network–there’s the attempt at bringing in a social view through a group of liberal students who work in the favela. Matters hinge on how Ramiro’s smart cop is a fellow student of the group by day, and a budding Elite Squad member by night, while Moura’s commanding officer is barely keeping it together as his wife is pregnant at home.

And so on. And so what? Well, yes, the Elite Squad busts into corners of the favela to shoot first and ask questions later, and this is startling enough for a few minutes. And if there’s a hell for cops who murder, then these guys are going there. But what Padilha, who’s much better at this point at making docs (Bus 167) than dramas, never decides is where sympathies lie, and what point of view his film finally should have. He shows all the signs of liberal concern (the racial flip among the cops, the well-intentioned students), and he also shows all the signs of rooting on the Elite-ists when they charge down alleys offing bad dudes. The central problem with The Elite Squad isn’t that it’s fascist; it’s that it hasn’t decided what it is, torn between interests and characters, and grossly unable (unlike, say Fincher’s Zodiac) of capturing a social panorama inside a genre structure, and allowing the wider world to inform the film. It’s too confused to be a training manual for anything.

Albertina Carri isn’t confused at all. Although her last feature pretty much stunk up the room–the let’s-just-forget-about-it Geminis–she has a lasting place in young Argentine cinema with her landmark autobiographical document, Los rubios. With La rabia–which translates as “The Anger,” though it should really retain it’s Spanish title since it identifies the name of a cafe-bar in the small farming town where the film’s set–she has raised her game to a new level. Everything in La rabia is pickled in emotional tension, impending violence, psychic dread and a poisonous stream of vengeance that’s in the class of the best of Peckinpah. A long-running feud between ranchers reaches a tipping point when a weasel from one ranch gets away and attacks cattle in another. When farmer Poldo (Victor Hugo Carrizo) later discovers what his young mute daughter Nati (Nazarena Duarte) has known all along–that her mother Alejandra (Analia Couceyro) is having ultra-kinky sex with rival farmer Pichon (Javier Lorenzo)–it’s enough for murder to happen. But La rabia is most inside Nati’s head, who acts out by stripping off her clothes, releasing screams at a piercing high pitch and pencilling stark and even obscene pictures, which Carri lets flight in animation sequences that appear done by Ralph Steadman at full rage. Nati, in reality, is cinema: She observes life around her and makes images out of it with accompanying sounds, and like many tough, uncompromising films (like this one), they all combine to send her parents into a tizzy. Carri’s is a horror film down on the farm, and it comes close to sui generis, capped by a recurring motif of the weasel, kept secure in a cage, but seen in close-up opening its toothy mouth, with jaw wide open, and emitting a hissing sound that can haunt nightmares. It’s already done it for me, and I’m afraid it’ll continue to do so for weeks to come.

A cinephile in the making…

Longtime readers of Filmjourney.org may have noticed a decisive lag in posts of late, and the reason is quite simple: my first child, Alexandra Anne Cummings, entered the world two weeks ago, and has been pretty greedy with my time. But we’re settling into a life pattern and the blogging here should resume with more frequency shortly. (Expect a lot of DVD reviews for a few months!)

In the meantime, enjoy Robert Koehler’s exciting posts (as time permits) from the Guadalajara International Film Festival, and feel free to check out a series of short posts on animation I’m publishing over at Beyond magazine this week, an Utne-nominated indie publication I’m very proud to be associated with. I’m looking forward to introducing Alex to as many of these films as possible over the ensuing years.

And as always, feel free to post any comments or questions on the discussion board…

Guadalajara Film Fest, Entry 1

GUADALAJARA: SEARCHING FOR A FESTIVAL

By Robert Koehler

So…. the idea with attending the Guadalajara film festival is to survey what’s popping up on the Mexican cinema horizon. The 23-year-old mission here has been to serve as a Mexico showcase, and it still is. Now, there are added layers, creating a slightly unwieldy superstructure of Latin American films–some of which are going places (or have already been) and some that will go nowhere.

Here’s the catch: I can’t blog about the films I’m reviewing here for Variety (and variety.com), so that means no Mexican films. Except Sergio Tovar Velarde’s negligible Aurora Borealis, notable only since it was inventively shot in low-end digital video by the great Mexican director Ricardo (Noticias lejanas) Benet, and Fernando Eimbcke’s Lake Tahoe, which just premiered in Berlin (and scored the Fipresci prize of international film critics).

Forget Aurora Borealis, but Lake Tahoe is something to hold onto, and keep close. Eimbcke, when we saw him last, made his sublime Duck Season, introducing the concept of deadpan comedy into the Mexican lexicon. (He told me at the time that he had to explain what “deadpan” was to the actors, the crew, everybody. He adores Aki Kaurismaki and Jim Jarmusch, so it couldn’t be otherwise.) Jarmusch is all over Lake Tahoe‘s early sections, but that turns out to be a misdirection or a subtle trick, since the film isn’t a Jarmuschian comedy. It’s a tragedy that gradually shifts mood from deadpan/absurd to somber and a wee bit nostalgic.

What happens when Juan (Diego Catano) dashes out of his family’s home and drives his Nissan into a light post, and then tries to find the right part to fix his engine? Well, for starters, Juan walks a lot, down empty streets in a sleepy coastal Yucatan town. (Eimbcke barely indicates it’s the Yucatan–there’s a distant sign, and there’s a lot of sand around the sidewalks.) He walks, and he walks. And walks. In and out of one auto repair place after another, each one with giant painted signs that look like they’ve been there for eons. The first joke: Tons of auto shops, but no cars driving around. Second joke: A shop’s door is open, but the unseen owner inside says he’s closed. Eimbcke appears at first to resort to Jarmusch imitation. Head-on shots, minimalist compositions and blackouts abound, exquisitely paced and timed. But it’s best to say that he’s stealing, and stealing extremely well. (Steal only from the best.)

He’s even better than Jarmusch at creating something from almost nothing. By the time Juan gets his part, and his repair, he has had to deal with a giant Mastiff, its fat auto shop owner whose business is so screwed up that he doesn’t even realize that his phone is unplugged, a lazy girl behind the counter of another shop who has a slow-moving crush on Juan (and a baby) and a repair guy who likes to do martial arts moves when everyone else least expects it. But the growing annoyance with the car repair is just cover for a greater weight growing inside his home: Juan’s mom won’t come out of her bathtub and his little brother sits in a tent in their front yard. Something’s going on. Eimbcke hangs out the mystery out, but he doesn’t indulge it, as Juan is able to put the pieces together to realize that his father is dead. The title refers to a Lake Tahoe bumper sticker that Juan’s aunt brought back from her trip there, which doesn’t seem at first to have anything to do with anything in particular, except that his dad had placed it on the car, and had always wanted to take the family there. And now,in the final shot, as the boys have removed the sticker, we know he never will.

It may be early, but everyone watching the films here is convinced that there’s no possible way that any film in the Mexican competition has a prayer against Lake Tahoe. I’ve heard this before, and then when least expected, something comes along. But this time, the guess may be right.

Guadalajara had become an old, doddering event that few outside of Mexico and Latin American film business reps paid much attention to; it just wasn’t a destination. Now, it is, partly because Latin American cinema has expanded, diversified, and shown that it’s sustainable, and partly because the festival has become more interesting. Cinephilia–which was more the kind of thing that FICCO, the Mexico City festival just ended, has cared about–has even appeared: A solid survey of recent Argentine films, which starts for me with Lisandro Alonso’s La libertad, the film that actually launched a whole new way of making post-narrative films. My Cinema Scope colleague Mark Peranson (who wrote possibly the first English-language text on La libertad after it premiered at BAFICI in 2001–that magic, terrible year) has noted that La libertad was also one of the first films of its era to break down the division between documentary and fiction. This, more than any other single thing, is what distinguishes the new world cinema, whether it’s by Raya Martin, Jim Finn, Pedro Costa or Albert Serra (and others). Alonso didn’t start what gets commonly called “New Argentine Cinema” (there were at least two previous “new” periods), but he radicalized it, and offered a new way.

As far as I know–and I might be wrong, so anybody out there in the blogosphere, correct me if I am–La libertad has never screened in Los Angeles. Not a surprise perhaps (it took a while before Alonso’s next, Los muertos, made it to Los Angeles). But this means that the most seminal film of the most important film movement of the past seven years hasn’t played in the would-be film capital of the world. But its context in Guadalajara is even more important, since La libertad is placed alongside other key films like Martel’s La cienaga and Carri’s Los rubios as a way of defining what a national film movement actually looks like. The irony is that there’s nothing absolutely Argentine about La libertad. Its freedom is a freedom from nationality, time-space, narrative laws, camera laws and the expectations that audiences instinctively impose on themselves. But pay attention to the actual translation of the Spanish title: “Liberty”–a harder, more profound word than “freedom,” a word pointing to a greater leap, a commitment to an ideal, an identifier for an equation that even describes its opposition–oppression. Liberty is harder-won. Liberty is that thing that the films that really matter aspire to. This one just has the balls to take it as its own name.

A film about Misael, who cuts trees and shapes them into logs for sale. A film, really, about what Misael does–searching for his trees, wandering, taking a shit, finding, chopping, shaving, napping, stacking, moving them to a distribution point, returning to his base camp labeled “Los errantes,” finding an armadillo for dinner, killing it, cutting it up, building a fire for the grill, grilling it, stacking the loose brush from his woodcutting, burning the brush, finishing the grilling, eating the armadillo (the hard shell forms a dish, as the dead tail wags back and forth), looking into the camera as lightning approaches. Active progressive verbs for an active progressive film that moves forward at every moment, considers every moment precious and immediate and the one thing right now–right. now.—that matters and nothing else. There are few films that encompass a world, a state of existence so purely and totally. Many have noted that Alonso’s film is one of those ultimate affirmations of Andre Bazin’s ideal cinema, the emphatic assertion of the real on screen. It allows the eye to pay absolute attention to what Misael is doing, because what he’s doing not only is what counts, but what defines him. So in that sense, you have the essence of character. But there’s the matching factor that almost nothing is even close to being “acted.” Certainly not “written.” La libertad is arranged and choreographed, an attentive contemplation on a human in nature. The big lie, by the way, is that this is ”minimalism.” (The same way we hear Apichatpong Weerasethakul described as ”minimalist.”) No–this is maximalism, a cinema containing everything needed for its own value and purpose, and that has the effect of growing in the mind, either as the viewer recalls it, or sees it again. (As you can on DVD, from the Collection Malba in Buenos Aires.)